Department for Work and Pensions v Information Commissioner
Department for Work and Pensions v Information Commissioner was a 2013 first-tier tribunal case in the United Kingdom. It concerned a dispute over whether companies that had participated in government 'workfare' schemes should be released under the Freedom of Information Act following a request by a man called Frank Zola. The tribunal ruled that the names of participant companies should be released.[1]
The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) appealed to the Upper Tribunal but on 15 July 2014 this was dismissed.[2]
References
- ^ "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 24 September 2015. Retrieved 27 September 2013.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link) - ^ Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber). "GIA 2560 2013". docs.google.com. HM Courts and Tribunals Service file hosted on Google Docs.
- v
- t
- e
- Community Action Programme
- Mandatory Work Activity
- Sector Based Work Academies
- Work Programme
- Steps to Work
- Day One Support for Young People Trailblazer
- Help to Work
- Community work placements
- A4e
- BEST
- Careers Development Group
- Employment and Skills Group
- G4S
- Ingeus
- Maximus
- Newcastle College
- PeoplePlus
- Prospects Services
- Reed
- Rehab
- Seetec
- Serco
- Working Links
- R (Reilly) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
- Department for Work and Pensions v Information Commissioner
Jobseekers (Back to Work Schemes) Act 2013
  | This article relating to law in the United Kingdom, or its constituent jurisdictions, is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |
- v
- t
- e
