Littlewood–Offord problem

In mathematical field of combinatorial geometry, the Littlewood–Offord problem is the problem of determining the number of subsums of a set of vectors that fall in a given convex set. More formally, if V is a vector space of dimension d, the problem is to determine, given a finite subset of vectors S and a convex subset A, the number of subsets of S whose summation is in A.

The first upper bound for this problem was proven (for d = 1 and d = 2) in 1938 by John Edensor Littlewood and A. Cyril Offord.[1] This Littlewood–Offord lemma states that if S is a set of n real or complex numbers of absolute value at least one and A is any disc of radius one, then not more than ( c log n / n ) 2 n {\displaystyle {\Big (}c\,\log n/{\sqrt {n}}{\Big )}\,2^{n}} of the 2n possible subsums of S fall into the disc.

In 1945 Paul Erdős improved the upper bound for d = 1 to

( n n / 2 ) 2 n 1 n {\displaystyle {n \choose \lfloor {n/2}\rfloor }\approx 2^{n}\,{\frac {1}{\sqrt {n}}}}

using Sperner's theorem.[2] This bound is sharp; equality is attained when all vectors in S are equal. In 1966, Kleitman showed that the same bound held for complex numbers. In 1970, he extended this to the setting when V is a normed space.[2]

Suppose S = {v1, …, vn}. By subtracting

1 2 i = 1 n v i {\displaystyle {\frac {1}{2}}\sum _{i=1}^{n}v_{i}}

from each possible subsum (that is, by changing the origin and then scaling by a factor of 2), the Littlewood–Offord problem is equivalent to the problem of determining the number of sums of the form

i = 1 n ε i v i {\displaystyle \sum _{i=1}^{n}\varepsilon _{i}v_{i}}

that fall in the target set A, where ε i {\displaystyle \varepsilon _{i}} takes the value 1 or −1. This makes the problem into a probabilistic one, in which the question is of the distribution of these random vectors, and what can be said knowing nothing more about the vi.

References

  1. ^ Littlewood, J.E.; Offord, A.C. (1943). "On the number of real roots of a random algebraic equation (III)". Rec. Math. (Mat. Sbornik). Nouvelle Série. 12 (54): 277–286.
  2. ^ a b Bollobás, Béla (1986). Combinatorics. Cambridge. ISBN 0-521-33703-8.


  • v
  • t
  • e